Collaborative Drama and the Institutionalization of the English Renaissance Theater
Published by: University of Massachusetts Press
Drawing on a range of documentary and literary sources as well as recent methodological advances in theater history, the book presents a sequence of case studies designed to accommodate both the larger cultural setting of the early modern theater and the localized, idiosyncratic factors influencing discrete literary productions. Each chapter chronicles the professional setting of a particular joint work and then investigates its rhetorical or linguistic traces in the resultant text. This approach allows Hirschfeld to locate specific links between modes of collaborative production and forms of dramatic representation and then explicate the literary and political implications of these connections.
Hirschfeld's case studies provide a fresh account of the institutionalization—the steady growth, organization, and incorporation—of the professional drama in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English cultural life. By attending to the changing shapes and stakes of joint enterprises, she shows that dramatists did not unconsciously absorb the practice of collaborative writing from general social discourses, but rather were aware of the material and symbolic significances of their work, meanings structured by the traditions of the developing professional theater and by the cultural pressures and anxieties attendant upon a new and often fragile institution.
"Very timely and in all sorts of ways highly impressive. . . . The book engages with two significant areas of research within the field of early modern drama studies—collaboration/ authorship on the one hand and friendship/ affect on the other—and offers significant new material to both."—Gordon McMullan, King's College, London
"A groundbreaking book, as it aligns English playing companies and practices with the activities and organization of the London guilds and shows how collaborative efforts in writing plays drew on many of the growing economic practices in Elizabethan and Jacobean England."—Arthur F. Kinney, University of Massachusetts Amherst
"Moving fluidly between theoretical models, this is rich, sophisticated, and suggestive--Greenblattian cultural poetics interplay with Bourdieusian sociology, which in turn finds common ground with such positivist theatrical history as that of Gurr, Elliot, and Nelson."—Richard Dutton, Studies in English Literature
"This highly recommended book ranges from the contexts of staging to the psychology of collaboration and the personal and professional associations of dramatists."—Chronique